Dynamic vs. Static URLs for SEO-00-1083

1) Static URLs typically Rank bigger as far as the search engines are concerned. 2) Static URLs are always friendlier looking as far as the end users are concerned. What the Official Google Webmaster Central Blog has to affirm on the issue: a) What is a static URL? A static URL is one that does not change, so it typically does not contain any url parameters. You can search for static URLs on Google by typing filetype:htm in the search field. Updating these kinds of pages can be age consuming, chiefly if the amount of facts grows quickly, since every single episode has to be hard-coded. This is why webmasters who deal with large, frequently updated sites like online shops, forum communities, blogs or content management systems may employ dynamic URLs. b) What is a dynamic URL? If the content of a site is stored in a database and pulled for display on pages on demand, dynamic URLs maybe used. In that dispute the site serves basically as a template for the content. You
can spot dynamic URLs by looking for characters like:? = &. Dynamic URLs have the disadvantage that different URLs can have the same content. So different users might link to URLs with different parameters which have the same content. That's one target why webmasters sometimes thirst for to rewrite their URLs to static ones. c) Should I try to generate my dynamic URLs examine static? Following are some key points you should keep in purpose while dealing with dynamic URLs: It's quite tough to correctly create and maintain rewrites that replace dynamic URLs to static-looking URLs. It's much safer to serve us the original dynamic URL and let us handle the enigma of detecting and avoiding problematic parameters.If you desire to rewrite your URL, please remove unnecessary parameters while maintaining a dynamic-looking URL. If you wish to serve a static URL instead of a dynamic URL you should create a static equivalent of your content. d) Which can Googlebot rec
ite better, static or dynamic URLs? "We've come across many webmasters who, like our friend, believed that static or static-looking URLs were an advantage for indexing and ranking their sites. This is based on the presumption that search engines have issues with crawling and analyzing URLs that incorporate session IDs or source trackers. However, as a trouble of fact, we at Google have made some progress in both areas. While static URLs might have a slight advantage in terms of clickthrough rates thanks to users can easily interpret the urls, the decision to manipulate database-driven websites does not imply a significant disadvantage in terms of indexing and ranking. Providing search engines with dynamic URLs should be favored over hiding parameters to create them gaze static." by Juliane Stiller and Kaspar Szymanski, Google Search Quality Team Search engines always face a quota of problems in creating links to dynamic content. If you are yourself able to know
these kinds of problems, you are halfway to getting your dynamic content indexed. Where ever possible, operate static URLs to reference dynamic content. If it is not viable then you must constitute positive that your dynamic URL is attached to by content referenced with the relieve of static URLs. You can also think upon making practice of paid-inclusion programs. Full text: http://computerandtechnologies.com/web-hosting/news_2008-12-18-22-00-04-893.html